PUBLIC MARKS with tags xhtml & whatwg

I did want to apologize for assuming that the XHTML errors I had recently were due to WhatWG members having fun at my expense. I've had people deliberately break my XHTML-based comments in the past when I've written about XHTML, and the break was documented with a screenshot in the web site of a WhatWG member. I put 2 and 2 together and came up with 5. (1/10/2009)

Anne VK est taquin (see via). -- Ceci dit j'admire Shelley pour maintenir ses sites en full xhtml + extensions > svg+rdfa. Mais Dieu que la route est difficile avec des navigateurs si peu adaptés. (Firefox et son yellow screen of death)

Discussion sur le forum Alsacréations en juin dernier - rem1: beaucoup sont encore confus sur le pourquoi du HTML5 - rem2: ce genre de discussion ne se retrouve plus que rarement sur les blogs. Les `insiders` ne bloguent plus que pour évacuer leur trop plein d'émotions.

L'un des problèmes prédominants soulevés dans un récent appel à commentaires était de parvenir à dépasser le débat HTML contre XHTML, car beaucoup de gens estimaient que nous devions chercher non pas à étendre HTML, mais à nous concentrer sur XHTML seulement

Il y a bien une compétition et une course de fond entamée. Est-ce que le HTML actuel est réformable ? Si non, le XHTML2 reviendra sur le devant de la scène.

Ian Hickson's comments

Ian Hixie ?

Introduction aux 2 approches pour l'évolution d'HTML défendues par le W3C et le WHATWG

In this two-part series, Edd Dumbill examines the various ways forward for HTML that Web authors, browser developers, and standards bodies propose. This series covers the incremental approach embodied by the WHATWG specifications and the radical cleanup of XHTML proposed by the W3C. Additionally, the author gives an overview of the W3C's new Rich Client Activity. Here in Part 2, Edd focuses on the work in process at the W3C to specify the future of Web markup.

In this two-part series, Edd Dumbill examines the various ways forward for HTML that Web authors, browser developers, and standards bodies propose. This series covers the incremental approach embodied by the WHATWG specifications and the radical cleanup of XHTML proposed by the W3C. Additionally, the author gives an overview of the W3C's new Rich Client Activity. Here in Part 1, Edd focuses primarily on two specifications being developed by WHATWG: Web Applications 1.0 (HTML5) and Web Forms 2.0.

with XForms and Web Forms 2.0 on the rise, this is probably going to change. But what are they? What are their new features? And more importantly, which one is going to be superior?

The Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group's approach to improving HTML

Eric van der Vlist - 3/06/2005 : Ignoré par Microsoft et concurrencée par le WHATWG, l'avenir de XHTML 2.0 semble donc bien incertain.