Sponsorised links
This year
Architectural Arguments | Thinking Clearly
Il y a juste un probleme dans le raisonnement de Roy Fielding. Si la dernière phrase est exacte… alors toutes les discussions autour du sujet sont inutiles. S'il y a discussion, c'est qu'il y a une peur de l'effet de la communauté html5 et dans ce cas, cela veut dire que cette communauté est suffisamment signifiante sur le marché des technologies. Elle a donc son mot à dire.HTML is just one of many data formats on the Web. These are all facts that are not open to debate—they are decisions that we made over a decade ago and reaffirmed by consensus of the TAG. Whether or not Ian agrees with the architecture is irrelevant.
Accueil - Puf
Le site d'un éditeur de livres en version béta sous wiki. Intéressant. Les URLs vont surement être détruites et je demande comment vont-ils gérer les anciennes.Version béta en cours d'expérimentation. Faites nous part de vos commentaires avant le lancement définitif.
danbri’s foaf stories » Ian Hixie and Mark Nottingham on Web Architecture
Simple things make firm foundations - W3C Q&A Weblog
There are lots of reasons for modularity. The basic one is that one module can evolve or be replaced without affecting the others. If the interfaces are clean, and there are no side effects, then a developer can redesign a module without having to deeply understand the neighboring modules.
index [MOAT]
MOAT (Meaning Of A Tag) provides a Semantic Web framework to publish semantically-annotated content from free-tagging. While tags are widely used in Web 2.0 services, their lack of machine-understandable meaning can be a problem for information retrieval, especially when people use tags that can have different meanings depending on the context. MOAT aims to solve this by providing a way for users to define meaning(s) of their tag(s) using URIs of Semantic Web resources (such as URIs from dbpedia, geonames … or any knowledge base), and then annotate content with those URIs rather than free-text tags, leveraging content into Semantic Web, by linking data together. Moreover, tag meanings can be shared between people, providing an architecture of participation to define and exchange potential meanings of tags within a community of users.
Sponsorised links
2007
The elaborated infoset: A proposal
the question of whether there is a 'default' XML processing model, and if so what it looks like.
XML.com: A Theory of Compatible Versions
2006
Names and addresses
W3C Position — Web Architecture Specialist
2005
