public marks

PUBLIC MARKS with tag WAI

2011

Wave : web accessibility evaluation tool

by astrochoupe
WAVE is a free web accessibility evaluation tool provided by WebAIM. It is used to aid humans in the web accessibility evaluation process. Rather than providing a complex technical report, WAVE shows the original web page with embedded icons and indicators that reveal the accessibility of that page.

État des lieux de l'accessibilité de HTML5

by astrochoupe
Nouvelles balises, zones de navigation, canvas, multimédia... Le point sur les capacités de la spécification en matière d'accessibilité Web.

Introduction to WAI ARIA

by astrochoupe
This article is for those who are new to ARIA. You need an understanding of HTML and the potential difficulties that people with disabilities can face using the Web. It is useful to be familiar with some Rich Internet Applications from a user's perspective

Accessibilité : module Firefox ARIA

by astrochoupe
The toolbar enables developers to examine WAI-ARIA live regions roles and properties, examine data tables, and determine if the colour contrast is sufficient.

2010

RGAA - Accessibilité pour les Administrations

by astrochoupe
Présentation du Référentiel Général d'Accessibilité pour les Administrations

2009

Techniques for WCAG 2.0

by srcmax

"Techniques for WCAG 2.0" provides information to Web content developers who wish to satisfy the success criteria of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 [WCAG20]. Techniques are specific authoring practices that may be used in support of the WCAG 2.0 success criteria. This document provides "General Techniques" that describe basic practices that are applicable to any technology, and technology-specific techniques that provide information applicable to specific technologies. The World Wide Web Consortium only documents techniques for non-proprietary technologies; the WCAG Working Group hopes vendors of other technologies will provide similar techniques to describe how to conform to WCAG 2.0 using those technologies. Use of the techniques provided in this document makes it easier for Web content to demonstrate conformance to WCAG 2.0 success criteria than if these techniques are not used.

Introduction à WAI ARIA (traduction) | Les intégristes

by piouPiouM & 9 others
Traduction de l’article “Introduction to WAI ARIA“, publié par Gez Lemon sur Dev Opera, le site d’Opera Software destiné aux développeurs.

2008

Juicy Studio: Label Positioning

by greut (via)

Forms that are laid out vertically with the prompts to the left of the form control have the advantage that the user can quickly scan down the left-hand side to determine what type of information they are required to provide. This is generally the best approach, although not always practical. For example, in languages such as German (emphasis added) where some words are a lot longer than others, it can create a situation where some prompts may be a long way from their associated form control, which obviously has an impact on usability. In these circumstances, positioning the prompt above the form control may be more appropriate.

bloddy German

Label Placement in Forms :: UXmatters

by greut & 5 others (via)

“Excessive distances between some labels and their input fields forced users unnecessarily to take more time to interact visually with the form.”

how form layout performs.

Colour Contrast Check - snook.ca

by greut & 31 others (via)

The Colour Contrast Check Tool allows to specify a foreground and a background colour and determine if they provide enough of a contrast "when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen"

better color checker

G18: Ensuring that a contrast ratio of at least 5:1 exists between text (and images of text) and background behind the text | Techniques for WCAG 2.0

by greut

The objective of this technique is to make sure that users can read text that is presented over a background. For Success Criterion 1.4.3, this technique describes the minimum contrast ratio for text that is less than 18 point (if not bold) and less than 14 point (if bold). For Success Criterion 1.4.5, this technique relaxes the 7:1 contrast ratio requirement for text that is at least 18 point (if not bold) or at least 14 point (if bold).

with the formula and advices

2007

Active users

astrochoupe
last mark : 21/05/2011 23:09

naudjf
last mark : 15/06/2010 20:18

srcmax
last mark : 25/09/2009 10:38

piouPiouM
last mark : 22/04/2009 06:53

krachot
last mark : 03/01/2009 11:56

Fabrice.bonny
last mark : 12/12/2008 13:34

greut
last mark : 24/09/2008 15:46

jdrsantos
last mark : 23/02/2008 18:41

mfaure
last mark : 10/12/2007 09:17

sebastien
last mark : 07/11/2007 09:40