2011
steelweaver - Reality as failed state - tl;dr version (I like doing this)
There is a problematic tendency with a certain type of intellect – the scientist, the technocrat – which assumes that, because it is prepared to organise and change on the basis of dry statistics and data, then, if only everyone else could be exposed to the same data, there would be instant consensus for change. In fact, of course, the majority of human beings do not work like this.
The fruits that can’t be held « Dokodemo Diary
2010
Network Realism: William Gibson and new forms of Fiction | booktwo.org
Hi James, (I guess I should put that somewhere, maybe on my Web site later today) About the article on Network Realism http://booktwo.org/notebook/network-realism/ I haven't read Gibson's book - Zero History, but I have written something about "Network Opacity" which somehow relates to the idea you are explaining. I usually do not like to use the word "Privacy", because I do not think it really exists as a binary concept. I prefer to use the concept of "Opacity" as a continuum of information permeability. More or less opaque, depending on contexts, people, distances and *time*, we will access to the information about people. The Internet network has a tendency to make the opacity super thin and that creates all issues that people/media call "Privacy". You can read about it "From Privacy To Opacity - Digital Me Management" http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/papers/privacy-ws-3 Let's go back to "Zero History". The value of things is motivated by a few parameters: * difficult to reproduce * difficult to access History has value because we forget. In a society, where all our memories are always accessible, identically, and even in some circumstances shared, memories has suddenly no meaning. They became part of the present. The value of remembering is (was) higher because we have a risk to forget. The opacity of time becoming thinner this risk is less important. Then the paradigm changes into something else. Maybe in our capacity to keep all these data always. We become obsess by data backups, we do not want to loose anything digital, because it becomes easier and cheaper to keep, to have access to the past at anytime. The past is part of the present. As for the future, it doesn't exist.Network Realism is writing that is of and about the network. It’s realism because it’s so close to our present reality. A realism that posits an increasingly 1:1 relationship between Fiction and the World. A realtime link. And it’s networked because it lives in a place that’s that’s enabled by, and only recently made possible by, our technological connectedness.
Timothy McSweeney's Internet Tendency: I'm Comic Sans, Asshole.
Timothy McSweeney's Internet Tendency: I'm Comic Sans, Asshole.
Bruce Mau Design
12. Keep moving.
The market and its operations have a tendency to reinforce success. Resist it. Allow failure and migration to be part of your practice.
2009
McSweeney's Internet Tendency: It's Weird to Think That One Day I'll Photoshop You Out of These Very Vacation Photos.
But one thing I've learned through my years of dating is that just because I'll want to erase you from my memory, I don't have to erase all these great travel experiences. Will I want to forget hiking up that volcano the other day? Of course not. I'll just want to forget that you were hiking with me − and thanks to the magic of Photoshop, I can.
Socio-Technical Assemblages « Service Design Research
There’s a strong tendency to see services as ‘things’: we often hear that services are ‘more complex’ than products. All kinds of means to grasp the complexity of an airline or a hospital can be applied – cybernetics, actor-network theory, etc. But the interaction between a prostitute and his or her john or jane is complex in a way I don’t think these approaches capture.
Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society
Stephen Colbert isn't really a right-wing nutcase; he just plays one on TV. We can be reasonably sure that when he promoted the term 'truthiness' to denote a claim that feels right, even if there is no factual evidence to support it, he was making fun of certain right-wingers whose fact-checking is mostly internal; who will accept as true a story that fits with their worldview, regardless of the facts. Of course this is a universal human tendency, to which left-wingers are not immune, but Manjoo cites scientific studies that indicate that right-wingers are more susceptible to it (see below).
L'UMP scientifiquement moins scientifique ?
2008
Raging Menace - MenuMeters
2007
McSweeney's Internet Tendency: One Thousand Monkeys Rise Up.
Hot! 2007 Preview - Most Popular Hi-Tech Tendency in 2007
2006
Raging Menace - MenuMeters
Slashdot | Linux Powers Military UGV
McSweeney's Internet Tendency:



