PUBLIC MARKS with search profit

Fortunately, just few days before, Opera folks came out with an experimental “style profiler” (followed by WebKit’s ticket+patch shortly after). The profiler was meant to reveal the performance of CSS selector matching, document reflow, repaint, and even document and css parsing times.

The slides could be improved by mentioning a few things more.

slide 19 – W3C didn’t pay for the logo work.

slide 21 – The WHATWG announces that they rename their document as HTML Living Standard. The snapshot which is published on W3C Web site under *patent policy* will be html5

slide 39 – The W3C has always said it was out for community review.

slide 56 – Things are cut from specs when there are not at least a double implementations of each features (Candidate Recommendation). It is the *normal* process. Nothing new. No aggressive timeline.

slide 69 – W3C here is W3C members. It illustrates a disagreement in between W3C members.

slide 82 – Microsoft is not joining the WHATWG because of the lack of patent policy. Nokia is not there, Access (NetFront) is not there, etc.

slide 93 – What are secret rules? The W3C Process is public, most of the WGs have their work in public. Specs are published in public.

slide 94 – Many working groups are open to public participation without fees. Example: HTMLWG.

slide 95 – False. There is a majority of Not For Profit and Affiliate companies.

slide 96 – False. By W3C Process, every member has one voice. W3C is a community of members. The listen is a bit strange.

slide

slide 98 – W3C members decided to move away from HTML brokeness and tried to move a cleaner markup leveraging on XML. We know it didn’t work and retrospectively it was a mistake.

slide 99 – False. The W3C moved from RAND (like IETF for example) to RF (Royalty Free) to give a safer environment for developers.

slide 102 – W3C said: “Be careful if you use the technology in production. There is no full interoperability yet”.

slide 107 – WHATWG people are exactly the same people that are working inside W3C Membership. Part of the work btw is done by the W3C webapps WG by the exact same people.

slide 125 – is spot on! ;) unfortunately.

The Flickr Foundation is a not-for-profit organization devoted to protecting the Flickr archive in the long term, and to facilitating cultural heritage projects concerned with the digital domain.

There are two issues on the better graph you realized and that could improve the whole thing.

1. Showing that it is from 2007 to 2010. The labeling gives only 2007 and creates confusion when seen alone without the context of the text.

2. Adding the word "World". The market share and profit share are intended to be worldwide. It is important, because many many articles are often given number when it is only USA market shares, and people copy them thinking it is worldwide.

Posted by:

karl | Oct 14, 2010 at 07:42 AM

Webscrapers is basically the short name for us. A bunch of people that are interested and knowledgable in web scraping, HTTP scripting, bot writing and internet spidering. For fun and profit.

Je ne pensais pas être un punk, mais il semble que ma vision de l'entreprise me classe dans les outsiders.

Alors si je dois rejoindre les rangs de Zoho, de 37signals et de cette nouvelle vague frémissante d'entrepreneurs à long terme, finalement, je veux bien être un punk.

Pendant que des journaux érigent des murs payants autour de leur contenu, plusieurs créateurs se demandent comment tirer profit du web.

Cine Asie Creatives is a unique sales agent, Distribution and Co-production company specializing in Asian films.

Our comprehensive knowledge of Asian film markets, expansive networks and business relationships with Asian film industry span over 20 years through our non-profit organization, Cine-Asie , which is actively recognized as one of the most important launching pads and exhibitors for Asian cinema in Canada.

We are located in Montreal, Canada.