This year
2011
DAAR - Decolonizing Architecture Art Residency
FapZap Is Dead
An Explosion of Opposition to the Internet Blacklist Bill | Electronic Frontier Foundation
The statements, written by people from a variety of backgrounds and political persuasions, incorporate many of the same broad themes: SOPA will threaten perfectly legal websites, stifle innovation, kill jobs, and substantially disrupt the infrastructure of the Internet. Here is a small sample of what they had to say
Like-Button von Facebook: Personenbezogene Daten – gefällt mir (nicht)! - Das Rechtsmagazin nicht nur für Juristen | Legal Tribune ONLINE
2010
Asturix 3
The Shameful Attacks on Julian Assange - David Samuels - International - The Atlantic
Every honest reporter and
editor in America knows that the fact that most news organizations are
broke, combined with the increasing threat of aggressive legal action by
deep-pocketed entities, private and public, has made it much harder for
good reporters to do their jobs, and ripped a hole in the delicate
fabric that holds our democracy together.
…My heart’s in Accra » John Palfrey: The Path of Legal Information
When a decision comes out, it’s been produced in a digital fashion – that we print it out is an artifact of our current system. We should release this information in an open, interoperable fashion so that we can generate new systems atop the law.
The poison of arrogance | Monday Note
Second, such practices ultimately damage revenues. Take Apple’s eBooks Store, for instance. Using of a French-based iTunes account prevents a customer from buying books in English on the US eBooks store, this without offering any legal reason for the prohibition. Now, turn to France: perhaps as a surprise to US-based Apple execs, a significant number of French iPad users want to read books in English. The result of Apple’s segregation of iTunes accounts? These users flock to Amazon Kindle’s application.
Ca a toujours été comme ça avec Apple, musique, puis vidéo et maintenant livres : nihil novi sub sole. La grande révolution d'Apple, ce ne sont pas les périphériques, ni les technologies, mais bien le modèle stalinien du magasin unique, avec ses fournisseurs approuvés par le régime.
IEEE P1817 Website
With P1817, product ownership is perpetual, and the tethers are severed that connect your purchases to their vendors. No one can restrict how you privately use or share them. However, because they are copyrighted, rightsholders retain the legal right to control public dissemination of their works. Just as a printed book can be lost if you share it publicly (i.e., with strangers), you must be careful to share only privately (i.e., with those you trust.) That's because anyone who shares either of your playkeys can take both of them and move them to his own device and his own online playkey bank! The availability and mobility of playkeys lets you electronically share, lend, borrow, give, take, donate, and resell digital property, just as you do with your physical possessions. And since playkeys remain singular, unique, and protected from counterfeiting, copyright holders know that your sharing will remain a private, non-public matter.
Linux Legal - para quem não tem medo de aprender: Lançamento do Lucid Lynx contará com os CDs oficiais da Canonical
Posterazor - Faites votre propre affiche! - Freeware (version Française sur Sourcforge)
Ubuntu de A a Zip: Ótimo Gerenciador de Fotos para Ubuntu: Picasa
Ótimo Gerenciador de Fotos para Ubuntu: Picasa
Linux Legal - para quem não tem medo de aprender: 100 cursos online (e gratuitos) de tecnologia em renomadas faculdades estrangeiras
Estúdio Livre : Kdenlive
Open isn’t so open anymore « Connectivism
karl says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
January 3, 2010 at 1:32 pm
When someone says ideology, I often, think « church » and all its derivatives : zealots, blasphemy, etc. An healthy ecosystem has diversity is hackable and makes it possible to have different outcomes.
1. Prehistory: « Open » being a kind of underground culture for a very long time became finally famous. Circumstances of the society, new priorities, new generation of people (geeks) helped to achieve that.
2. The age of iron: For anything which is successful at a macro level in the society come the second generation of people who want benefits of it. First they are the initial « believers » who were living from another activity and wants to live accordingly with their beliefs. It is the first shock and the first softener of the ideology. They have to make compromise with the other markets of the ecosystem. It’s when we start to hear *pragmatic* discourses. Few of them will be successful and then will start bending some rules.
3. The age of industrial revolution: The ecosystem of is here and there are a lot of secondary activities and people. Some people who were not believers but who were just mere employees of the believers. This includes marketers, businessmen, business angels, etc. They want to make a living, they want to invest into it. A lot of tools are available and people using them don’t even know they are the byproduct of this original philosophy. Some people think we have to be careful and keep a minimum of the principles and they organize control organizations (certification, labelling, etc.). It can even reach the legal and political framework of the society.
4. The age of financial market: The original philosophy is gone, the system remains. Some of the original believers think it is a big success for the philosophy. Some getting older became a lot more flexible than when they were young. Some are angry (sometimes very angry) because the principles have been forgotten. They will fork, restart a small group (prehistory) or go on a deserted island and exclude themselves with broken flowers in their dreams.
This happens in many many social groups. Look at organic culture for example, or certain think tanks. It all depends on which levels you want to be, which matters to you. Global or local.





