2011
2010
RT @jmplanche: ... on va s'apercevoir que @Maitre_Eolas, c'est Julian Assange. RE http://bit.ly/esfAAH // Coté cheuveux, ça le fait pas !
Julian Assange and the Computer Conspiracy; “To destroy this invisible government” « zunguzungu
To radically shift regime behavior we must think clearly and boldly for if we have learned anything, it is that regimes do not want to be changed. We must think beyond those who have gone before us, and discover technological changes that embolden us with ways to act in which our forebears could not. Firstly we must understand what aspect of government or neocorporatist behavior we wish to change or remove. Secondly we must develop a way of thinking about this behavior that is strong enough carry us through the mire of politically distorted language, and into a position of clarity. Finally must use these insights to inspire within us and others a course of ennobling, and effective action.”
Julian Assange, “State and Terrorist Conspiracies”
Julian Assange - Who Will Be TIME's 2010 Person of the Year? - TIME
The Shameful Attacks on Julian Assange - David Samuels - International - The Atlantic
Every honest reporter and
editor in America knows that the fact that most news organizations are
broke, combined with the increasing threat of aggressive legal action by
deep-pocketed entities, private and public, has made it much harder for
good reporters to do their jobs, and ripped a hole in the delicate
fabric that holds our democracy together.
“Allô, c’est Julian Assange” » Article » OWNI, Digital Journalism
Le samedi 8 octobre, à 19h30, Nicolas Voisin, directeur de la publication d’OWNI, reçoit un mail à l’adresse ‘contact@owni.fr’. Quelqu’un demande à parler en urgence aux développeurs de l’application Warlogs que nous avions réalisée fin juillet, lors de la publication de plus de 75,000 documents concernant la guerre en Afghanistan. Comme j’avais coordonné le boulot pour OWNI sur ce projet, il me le fait suivre.
2009
Re: POST from Julian Reschke on 2009-08-16 (www-tag@w3.org from August 2009)
No, using POST to add to a collection is the right thing to do. An alternative is PUT, in case you want to allow the client to specify the name of the new sub resource.











